Thread by @Larry_Beech

Just got done listening to papad's long michael tracy interview👇

Picked up about his third interview where clinesmith showed up.

To recap first int was jan 2017 where fbi acts like they want to know about millian and papa twlls them about mifsud.

2nd int they want him to wear wire w/ mifsud.

But the third int. In february they changed tune completely...all they nowwanted to know was who in the campaign he might have told about what mifsud.

First point. When they wanted him to wear wire on mifsud in london (even though he'd be in town soon) it was grooming. GP wears wire, mifsud tells him bad things about russia/trump, fbi pretends papa busted mifsud - "youre a hero kid👍"....now we need you to go record trump😉

But papa said no. So in third interview all they want is for him to say WHO in the campaign he told of mifsuds overture.

Why?

From the mueller report i figured the 3rd int date was February 10, 2017

Lets look at the events between jan 27 and February 10 that lead to the sudden but urgent change in focus dmfor what they wanted from papa d:

Feb 8 - sessions confirmed

Feb 9 - sessions sworn in

Feb 10 - 3rd papa interview - fbi (clinesmith) desperate for papa d to say he told sessions about mifsuds dirt on hillary claim. Make sense now.

google.com/amp/s/www.foxn…

For context papa d's 3 interviews took place almost in the same time frame of Flynns fbi ambush and push to force him to resign.

Papa d had been in the news too.
google.com/amp/s/m.jpost.…

I really believe at that time, Jan/Feb 2017, they were trying to use papa d (who they previously lost interest in) as a desperate attempt to somehow neuter or remove sessions. It eventually took leaking surviellence info, kislyak meetings to get it done.