@LowCarbUSA
Believes no justification for taking a statin.
Mr Fit study. Showing a slide that appears to show a huge death from CVD with incr in Chol. Actually .3 & to 1.3%
FH study w/ people on statins & CV events. No difference in events between LDL, but difference in CAC. Higher CAC more CV events.
FBG & BG<100 0CAC, higher BG higher CAC
Jupiter Study discussion on how numbers crunched to get their advertised benefit numbers.
Study that showed treatment in 200 people needed to save 1 life in secondary prevention. BMJ 2001
No studies show double digit benefits.
No studies done on Keto or LC and statins.
Numerous effects of statins reported.
METSIM showed T2D inc in statin users.
Inc in breast cancer women on statins study
Wrote a commentary on 60 different medical papers on adverse affects. Avail on Open Access.
What causes CVD? Clotting factors. More Fibrinogen and Factor VIII.
Recommends "Lies My Doctor Told Me" by Ken Berry
End.
Q/A
- Low level benefit. Adverse affects might be stronger than benefits.
- LPa interferes with clotting breakdown, need to get down
-Inc BG activating platelets
- Spreading word to medical students
- RR being misrepresented is industry problem
- CAC to drive statin prescriptions? Statins increase CAC but don't find more coronary events in statin users.
- Should be a rule that absolute & RR presented.
Thank you @LDLSkeptic for a great talk!