, 3 tweets, 1 min read Read on Twitter
Panel just now on @ReliableSources, during which commentator trying to defend Farrakhan wouldn't name him or thus condemn Alex Jones etc, shows exactly why Facebook banned anti-Semitic Farrakhan along w/ far-right conspiracists. It was smart but manipulative "both-sides-ism"
But this is potentially a terrible precedent to set, that decisions to ban some of the worst actors must be "balanced" to avoid accusations of bias (that they'll get anyway)
B/c altho drowned out by shouting colleagues, @irin is right: research shows allowing conspiracies/hate/propaganda to proliferate on social media legitimizes them as "ideas"+ once people see stuff, they think it's true. "Fighting bad ideas with good" is not how social media works
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Molly McKew
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!