, 6 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
This sets an incredibly dangerous precedent for the future of the free press. thedailybeast.com/us-charges-wik…
If the government is willing to prosecute Assange for publishing classified material it didn't want to be made public, it can do the same to The New York Times, CNN, and the rest.
And if that was all he had been charged with, that might be a good point. But the new charges are for *publishing the information* itself.
Left, a response I’m seeing frequently.
Right, a law professor explains why it is irrelevant.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Matthew Gertz
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!