,
6 tweets,
3 min read
Read on Twitter
THREAD: Everyone, myself included, is focused on Barr's move to investigation of the investigate, or in Trump talk SpyGate. But then in writing on Barr's sidestepping IG office for future investigation (forthcoming piece), I noticed a tidbit from his interview with Crawford. 1/ 
2/ So what was that other investigation related to Hillary Clinton? I had assumed it was something Russia-related, but wanted to double check. So here's Session's letter to Huber.
3/ And what was in that November 13 letter referred by Sessions? Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation. (Here's the full letter pdf.) cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/image…
4/ And why would Huber make sense for that investigation? H/T @judicialwatch archive.sltrib.com/article.php?id…
5/ Here's what Judicial Watch wrote at the time: judicialwatch.org/bulletins/clin… So while Huber was handicapped by the OIG investigation into FISA Abuse, the same can't be said for the Uranium One investigation. And "bring to fruition" to me, doesn't sound like a dead end. Of course,
6/6 we won't know until we know. But in event that Barr concludes there's no there there, let's be better prepared than Left was for Mueller's no collusion conclusion, and inoculate ourselves to ensure that TDS doesn't mutate to HDS & infect us! Lead by example & accept results.
