Marc Andreessen famously said that software is eating the world.
More precisely — what software truly enables — is markets eating the world.
Markets take opaque and turn and them into liquid markets
Thesis here:
Those industries are the most problematic: Healthcare. Education. Construction.
Software / Markets aren’t eating those industries.
Who is? Tribalism. Bureaucracy.
When Tribalism eats the world, it’s about who you know, who you can charm (read: bribe), and who owes you favors.
H/t @Meaningness meaningness.com/metablog/post-…
Certain things work at certain scales, & break down at others.
e.g. “At Fed level, libertarian; state, Republican; local, Democrat; family/friends, socialist."
Communal mode (tribe living) is what we’re wired for--it's what makes us happy.
Systematic mode (capitalism) is what helps us feed a billion people and helps us live until we’re 80.
Everyone does equal work, gets equal resources, and has special and unique relationships with each person.
You can run a camping trip this way, but you can’t run a complex society like that.
It doesn’t bring you meaning or happiness directly (and may even threaten your traditional notion of it), but it brings you GDP, which extends life span & feeds billions of people.
The opposite fear is that if you have systematic mode eating the micro world -- our sense of belonging and meaning would collapse.
To some extent, that's happening:
You can’t run an economy prioritizing belonging.
The goal of the economy is to provide material abundance to all.
Running it like a Kibbutz won't work.
You can’t run your communities & relationships like Bridgewater.
While it works for an economy, it can hurt your personal relationships
Benefitting from the growth the systematic mode brings while also benefiting from the happiness choiceness mode brings.
Creating a new equilibrium.
Keep the market-ism out of our tribes, and the tribalism out of our markets.