,
14 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
Why is everyone surprised at the Jihad launched against Bharatavarsha by Lutyens losers? When were they ever pro-India?
On Feb 28, 2002, the Hindu's editorial blamed the Hindus for getting burnt alive in the Sabarmati express.
Other opeds & columns blamed INDIA for "inviting" the Kargil war. I kid you not.
Leading this disgusting pack of traitors was a magazine named Outlook. Vinod Mehta was its chief then.
A guy labelled as the "whore of London" by his own fellow journos actually wrote that it was "imperative" that India should "gift" Kashmir to Pakistan as a gesture of goodwill and peace. A "mainstream" paper ran the story.
His stooge in Mumbai wrote a long form blog post justifying it.
Fast forward to UPA 1. Editors and senior journos ran arms rackets in such diverse places as Kashmir valley, Punjab and even Goa.
One editor/journo was so brazen that a top Cong party leader fixed him through one of the Intel agencies. This guy begged & wept for mercy. Case was closed.
Another big part of this sleazy media deals was the supply of "exotic" women to various powerful people.
You know what was even worse? "How to spin 26/11 attacks" so that it causes least damage to their favourite party. Their fall guy? Shivraj Patil. Not that he was an angel but it's a good example of the Nehru sultanate's MO.
A representative sample, in fact the crowning glory of this kind of "journalism" was Tehelka. Read its archives from late 2003 up to its implosion. Other media houses did the same thing with greater skill and lesser brazenness.
If you had been to Khan Market in that period, it more resembled Khan Media Mafia Market.
I can go on and on but this should suffice for now.
I distinctly remember writing 7 pieces in a single day mocking & exposing these media traitors on my Sandeepweb blog. Anyway, the larger point is that these worms will never change.
