Jim asks if all the @LindsayGrahamSC noise about the FISA warrants and arresting the Trump Russia investigators is a concern or a grand distraction.
It’s a concern.
It arises from a reactionary desire to destroy.
💠Repeal the ACA
💠Warm the globe
💠Destroy the environment for corporate profit
💠Jail those who investigated Trump Russia
💠Manufacture a border crisis / take steps to make the border crisis worse⤵️
newrepublic.com/article/155025…
💠Deliberately inflict pain on people
💠Cause massive destruction
💠Put money into the pockets of would-be oligarchs
💠All the above.
There's a method to the madness, best understood in the context of reactionary politics.
Underlying reactionism is “anger, fear, nostalgic hope, betrayal, and perceived injustice.”
The word “again” in “MAGA” signals reactionist politics.
For more, see⤵️
💠They could grab women⤵️
💠They could grab land (the frontier!)
💠Before regulatory agencies they could manipulate markets, fix prices, launder money, and pollute rivers
Recall that when David Koch was the Libertarian Party 1980 vice presidential candidate, he advocated abolishing (among other things) the FBI, CIA, and IRS. nytimes.com/1984/10/16/art…
To return to the "good old days" you must dismantle all those agencies.
@AshaRangappa_ has tirelessly explained why the GOP attacks on the FISA warrant are nonsense. See, for example:
Why are @LindseyGrahamSC and pals lying?
Because the lies are destructive.
I wrote about why Trump supporters pretend to believe his lies in this Slate article⤵️ slate.com/news-and-polit…
The lie—“the warrant was illegal”—points to a deeper truth: The existence of the FBI is a threat to their “individual liberty.”
What we call legal surveilling with a warrant, they call “spying.”
A wrecking ball (Trump) is more efficient.
(Much of the nostalgia is for a mythic era, but that's an other thread)
Timothy Snyder calls it Sadopopulism.
See:
Sadopopulism explains how oligarchs—those who seek both power and wealth—seize power and stay in power.
Sadopopulism is simple: Enact policies that cause pain, turn the pain into anger, and direct the anger against "enemies."
Meanwhile the would-be oligarchs are enriching themselves through tax cuts and policies that allow them to pollute rivers for profit.
A leader like Obama tried to make life better for average Americans.
Would-be oligarchs can’t do that.
If they do, others can rise and challenge their power.
Ding. Ding. Ding.🛎️
Wrong.
We've had two oligarchies in the U.S. so far.
Because of the advantages in the electoral college and the 3/5 rule, those who were pro-slavery held disproportionate power and wealth in America.
The Civil War ended slavery, but soon came the rise of robber barons and a second oligarchy.
See⤵️
@HC_Richardson
We are now experiencing our third slide into oligarchy.
GOP policies have created today's income inequality, which is approaching what we had in the 1920s👇
OK, so, how do we get out of this third oligarchy?
There are 2 ways to respond to the current reactionist politics of destruction and sadism.
💠Fight fire with fire, or
💠Work to stabilize our institutions while we remove the reactionaries from power through legal means.
Democracy is grinding work
Checks and balances slow the pace
Due process takes time
Autocrats aren't hampered by any of that, so they can move quickly.
The ability of autocrats to move quickly explains their appeal.
When a doomsayer says, "Nobody is doing anything; everyone is complicit," ask that person, "What are you doing personally to strengthen democracy?"
Spreading panic doesn't count, and in fact, helps Trump.
facebook.com/terikanefielda…
@vwinsloe