,
6 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
The OLC lawyers who signed off on the coverup should appear in public, under oath, and explain how the #WhistleblowerComplaint’s allegation about placing the readout in the wrong database DOESN’T affect intel comms wrongdoing.
That opinion is a disgrace.
Thugs with JDs.
That opinion is a disgrace.
Thugs with JDs.
The idea that it’s not under DNI purview because one individual is the President negates the reality of all the other people who were:
- on or aware of the call and engaged in coverup
- assisting Rudy from within the IC, including at State
- involved in the recall of Ambassador
- on or aware of the call and engaged in coverup
- assisting Rudy from within the IC, including at State
- involved in the recall of Ambassador
Is there a crime-fraud exception to Executive Privilege? (Asking for a friend)
Attacking this guy for checking with lawyers (even if those lawyers were carrying water) and not tweeting is an odd move for Ds.
Seems like you’d want this guy to be held up as what to do when people see bad stuff happening and welcome him into a warm pool bipartisan praise.
Seems like you’d want this guy to be held up as what to do when people see bad stuff happening and welcome him into a warm pool bipartisan praise.
It’s like they’re doorman standing to the side of a now-open door into a roomful or gory, disgusting, impeachable crimes:
Hey!! You!! Why the hell didnt you open this door!!
::man motions toward room of crimes::
Why didn’t you open this door sooner?!
Talk about the crimes.
Hey!! You!! Why the hell didnt you open this door!!
::man motions toward room of crimes::
Why didn’t you open this door sooner?!
Talk about the crimes.
Exactly.
