Thread by @DawsonSField

Of course Rudy's team would go to Kiev if the Ukrainians had exculpatory evidence that would help his client who has been falsely accused of colluding with the Russians.
That's a defense lawyer's job!

So what was the big problem? The Prosecutor General of Ukraine was throwing out giant red pills for the world. Red pills most of my followers understand are likely true!
First: that Ukrainians colluded with the DNC & US State Dept. in an attempt to rig the 2016 election.

Second: that State Department employees & the US Ambassador had obstructed justice in the Ukraine by providing a do not prosecute list to Ukrainian officials.

Pretty clear, we have video of Biden discussing this obstruction of justice. Ukraine has already handed over the receipts!

Huge red pill again, a Ukrainian court has already ruled against individuals who participated in influencing the 2016 election to help the Dems. One of the defendants says a court has overturned it? That isn't the same as a court actually overturning it.

WB mistakes multiple levels of competing corrupt acts for an exoneration of anyone involved in influencing the 2016 election. WB also goes back to attacking Gtiuliani & Barr to neutralize the DOJ actions to exonerate Trump & prosecute the guilty parties.

They even try to implicate Durham as being unduly influenced by Giuliani, in an effort to stave off the reality of any prosecutions that he may be bringing soon!

Why wouldn't a defense attorney talk to prosecutors who have evidence that his client was being framed by dirty cops on at least 2 continents?

They are desperate enough to make the argument that being removed as Ambassador for being involved in potentially criminal conduct, is the proof that the Ambassador is a good person only doing their jobs until Trump's cronies intruded to get her.
Sure...

This starts to look like my theory on PG Lutsenko & others may be true, that Ukrainians fed fake dirt to Dems to help them against Trump. Then thought they could feed fake dirt to Trump too. So finding out the real facts is a challenge.

Well, here is Giuliani stating clearly that they are not meddling in an election, good luck proving intent that he wasn't just trying to help his client in a legal matter.

As is pretty typical, the State Dept. cronies wanted control of everything. Which lets them decide what gets communicated to Ukraine, & what Ukraine communicates back to the President.
Good thing Ambassadors work for the President not the other way around.

Not surprising that the new President of Ukraine would be expected to break with the tradition of corruption that has dominated Ukraine since it left the Soviet Union. Being the first non-corrupt President of a nation isn't easy & requires proof!

The President set the bait for this revelation in June!

It is all going to come out! Pretending it was all rigged to make Trump happy isn't going to work! But it seems like the Dems are going to take positions to their detriment on crimes other Dems have committed!

Just like the Avenatti FINCEN leaker, they were baited into coming forward by moving the file into a secured system & taking away the WB access to the file.

Interesting, the WB then claimed they couldn't tell if these items were classified for real national security issues so they classified them. But making someone prove that they are the first non-corrupt President of Ukraine rather than taking their word on it seems important.

Then they save the kicker for last! Trump suspended security assistance to Ukraine in July without explaining it to OMB or NSC staffers the WB talked to.

Anyone wanna bet there was some money being skimmed off this program & kicked back to people?

One section & it's footnote remain classified. I'm sure both intelligence committees have read it so it will leak.

Wanna bet the Dems will use that classified section (that the WB thought classified too!) to claim something is being covered up?

Giving an excuse to declassify!