.@adamgoldmanNYT: FBI began its Russia probe "after learning that a Russian intermediary had offered information" to Trump campaign. Adam knows that's false: FBI never "learned" Mifsud was "a Russian intermediary" and has never accused him of being one. nytimes.com/2019/11/27/us/… 
@adamgoldmanNYT The Mueller team & other officials have disingenuously tried to suggest that Mifsud was a Russian intermediary. But it's the job of reporters to report the facts, not what intelligence officials want people to falsely believe in the absence of actual evidence.
@adamgoldmanNYT .@adamgoldmanNYT repeats the falsehood later in the article, calling Mifsud "the Russian intermediary who promised dirt to Mr. Papadopoulos." Adam knows that Mifsud has never been accused of being a Russian intermediary -- so why call him one?
@adamgoldmanNYT This is incredible spin -- we didn't spy on the Trump campaign, just four individuals who happened to work on it:
