Yes, in the long run our troops are safer without the person most responsible for killing thousands of them on the battle field.
The idea that our troops would be safer with someone actively leading the effort to kill them still in play is unbelievable ignorance.
The idea that our troops would be safer with someone actively leading the effort to kill them still in play is unbelievable ignorance.
We shouldn't take out people who kill Americans because they might react by killing more Americans is just such backwards logic.
People really need to pause and think about what they are saying.
People really need to pause and think about what they are saying.
“A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.”
Appeasement does not work. Refusing to fight back against someone who is actively trying to kill Americans is not an answer.
Appeasement does not work. Refusing to fight back against someone who is actively trying to kill Americans is not an answer.
