Why isn't the public allowed to see the originating authorization from Rosenstein to Mueller?
Or the two subsequent expanded scope memos?
DOJ and FBI hid them from congress.
theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/03/22/imp…
There was a full paragraph of the Rice letter redacted in the original release (Feb 8, 2018). The paragraph speaks to why she wrote it. Why is that Rice letter being hidden?
judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…
But why didn’t the DOJ/FBI release all of the Bruce Ohr 302’s without redaction?
Those unredacted 302’s should have been part of the IG report release. Why hide them?
scribd.com/document/42124…
Again, Judicial Watch won the Comey Memo FOIA. The IG eventually released them (redacted). But what about the Archey Declarations?
theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/27/doj…
Next up the original list from congress in the spring of 2018:
Which sounds like the "Woods File".
This was a declassification requested to be included within the IG report of FISA abuse. It wasn't.
Presumably "Bucket Five" would include the revealed State Dept emails of Kathleen Kavalac:
scribd.com/document/40936…
[NOTE: This one justified by Durham withholding]
So where is it?
Then again, maybe that's ultimately the issue....
Transparency creates accountability.
There's no motive for President Trump not to be transparent. However, a motive for Bill Barr not to be transparent would depend on his goal.
/END