Leftists have distorted the abortion conversation by using rare medical situations as an excuse for legal abortion at all times. A pregnancy that isn’t compatible with life requires a medical removal, not an abortion. Intentionally killing a healthy baby is what we want outlawed.
We really need to be clear with the terminology as we have discuss this so rational people understand that we don’t want to outlaw medical removal of an already dead or dying baby. We want to stop healthy babies from being killed for no reason.
Pro choice people love to use the term "spontaneous abortion" to justify their stance which is weird because that’s a miscarriage, not an actual abortion. This distorted misuse of medical terminology needs to be corrected and we need to be more direct in how we discuss this.
Let’s stop getting sidetracked from discussing the real issue: Killing healthy babies because a woman decides they should die. That’s what pro-choice people need to defend.
Rape & incest = 1% of all abortions
Fetal health problems = 3% of all abortions
The rest are elective.
Rape & incest = 1% of all abortions
Fetal health problems = 3% of all abortions
The rest are elective.
If we can change the structure of the conversation, we can change a lot of hearts & minds. If we reframe this to be a conversation asking if killing millions of healthy babies is a "right", this issue becomes so clear. The rare health/rape/incest scenarios are different entirely.
That’s my thought on the current state of the abortion issue going into 2020. How do you feel about it and why? Do you agree with my position? Are you surprised that those scenarios pro-choice people talk about so often are so incredibly rare?
Interested to hear your thoughts.
Interested to hear your thoughts.
