, 10 tweets, 4 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
1 / 10

Trump's heralded trade deal with China rests on a $200 bn assumption:

China will increase purchases of US exports by $200 bn over 2020-21.

But a look at

The agreement's LEGAL text
+ DATA
+ ECONOMICS
___
= this is highly UNLIKELY.

My latest
piie.com/blogs/trade-an…
2/10

Why? LOTS of contributing reasons:

The deal’s start is TODAY, not some “2017 baseline.” Trump’s trade war means US exports to China are now $20 bn per year LOWER than 2017.

The deal demands Beijing increase purchases by *$240 bn* – not $200 bn – over TWO short years...
3/10

Decomposing Chinese import commitments BY SECTOR – agriculture, manufacturing, energy, services — reveals why achieving the growth target is so DIFFICULT:

• China’s slowing economic growth
• pre-2017 slowing US export trends
4/10

This matters. With unrealistic export targets, the US-China deal may be doomed from the start.

Other benefits of ACTUAL Chinese commitments in the agreement could be put in peril.

Trade tensions could resume...
5/10

Also, in response to US pressure in the US-China deal, Beijing could divert imports away from other foreign sources to try to meet some US targets

Those countries, and the trading system, will suffer...
6/10

The US-China agreement may test MANY countries’ exports to China, several of which are traditional US allies.

This undermines their willingness to work together on OTHER key issues, including the US-EU-Japan initiative on Chinese subsidies...
7/10

Five more forces at work against Trump’s export targets:

1. Lingering uncertainty created by Trump’s policy
2. New US export controls
3. Trump’s tariffs on $360 bn remain and slow future Chinese growth
4. Severed trade ties due to Trade War
5. African swine fever
8/10

The incompleteness of Trump’s trade management — even in THIS deal — means other US companies and workers could be hurt

• $51.6 bn (23%) of US exports to China are NOT legally covered by the managed trade
• China is NOT on the legal hook for trade in these products
9/10

Unrealistic export targets may imperil not only trade peace but also the trade progress required to tackle the legitimate concerns in the US-China relationship.
10/10

For more on OTHER elements of the legal commitments in the US-China agreement, check out the latest episode of my @Trade__Talks podcast

With @SoumayaKeynes, @DarciVetter, and more…

tradetalkspodcast.com/podcast/118-in…
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Chad P. Bown

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!