Thank you for your objectivity Distinguished sir. This however raises a whole lot of questions as to the essence of having a Supreme Court if not for its unique role of being the interpreter of the constitution & other laws in the country EQUITABLY! #FixSociety 🚨
We must not forget that a Supreme Court as constituted as ours in recent time, that mainly seek technicalities to favor certain agenda is denigrating our constitutional democracy & ruins the value, development and healthy functioning cum preservation of our democracy.
Are we saying that INEC couldn’t have been called to order or made to present what is lacking for justice to be served and seen to be served even when the total number of votes is more than total accredited voters at the election? Is this Justice, Fairness and Equity?! 🤔
There is nothing Supreme about our Supreme Court as currently balkanized under an incompetent leadership of one that can not even prove his education and qualification asides being an appendage to an agenda against the law of the land. This too shall pass! #EndImpunity
A lawyer can deploy technicalities as an argument to win any case while jettisoning morality or ethics for profit and establishment of notoriety but the head of the Supreme Court need not answer to any agenda but Equity, Justice and Fairness to All Concerned. This is Evil!
My lay exploration of Equity can not but highlight — “Bonus judex secundum æquum et bonum judicat, et æquitatem stricto juri præfert.” —A good judge decides according to Justice & Right, and prefers Equity to strict law (technicalities).
End
End
