REPORT: There is a growing chorus of Senior Military leaders who are moving toward a Court Martial of Lt.Col Alexander Vindman disobeying an order of the Commander-in-Chief that, "Was Not manifestly unlawful." (1/x)
CONTINUED: Military Prosecutors believe Lt.Col.Vindman violated the law by testifying before Congress after @POTUS ordered no such action should occur, "It's within executive authority to prohibit the communication of information that the executive branch determines...
(2/x)
(2/x)
CONTINUED: "...to be classified, sensitive, top secret, not to be disclosed to anyone without prior authorization.”
In this case @realDonaldTrump made clear that the executive would not share this "sensitive" information regarding foreign policy with congress. (3/x)
In this case @realDonaldTrump made clear that the executive would not share this "sensitive" information regarding foreign policy with congress. (3/x)
CONTINUED: Lt.Col.Alexander Vindman ignored this Presidential Order and testified before Congress without approval of the Commander-in-Chief. Vindman substituted his desires as a @WHNSC employee for that of the President. Military JAG Lawyers suggest in so doing...(4/x)
CONTINUED: Vindman violated the UCMJ & Federal Laws regarding the "unlawful dissemination of Sensitive or Classified Information"...
Military lawyers suggest the Military Whistleblower Protection law does NOT protect Vindman as he was not disclosing a " Manifestly Unlawful Act"
Military lawyers suggest the Military Whistleblower Protection law does NOT protect Vindman as he was not disclosing a " Manifestly Unlawful Act"
