@Himansh72125945 @maidros78 1. Pranaam. I think that the singular problem is that Oak took up Vartak’s theory for 5561BCE inc prewar/war TL which is such a deeply flawed theory that no amount of support will help either him or the theory. It fell flat on its face 30/40 years ago n same is happening now +
@Himansh72125945 @maidros78 2. + having said that can I say that, and I said this to @bombay_delhi earlier, it’s partially because of Oak that I learnt enough to be called to give lectures. If I had not been challenged by him, I wouldn’t have bothered with MBH, I hv too much work otherwise.+
@Himansh72125945 @maidros78 @bombay_delhi 3. + only somebody who has got that knowledge knows the feeling which I have now.
Having said that: I am pretty certain, this 5551BCE theory of many reversed timelines won’t last too long:)
Having said that: I am pretty certain, this 5551BCE theory of many reversed timelines won’t last too long:)
