🚨 NEW SITUATION. There's now evidence that there are some precincts still fully missing from the IDP results. And that other precincts have been double counted.
And this isn't just in Sioux City, @CoatsandLinen confirms.
The IDP results are NOT "100% reporting."
And this isn't just in Sioux City, @CoatsandLinen confirms.
The IDP results are NOT "100% reporting."
@CoatsandLinen It goes without saying that every media channel that's reporting results should immediately remove its "100% reporting" & clean this stuff up.
@CoatsandLinen This has nothing to do with "correcting 95 precints anymore."
Multiple precincts are entirely missing from these results, & are being reported as having the results of other precincts.
Multiple precincts are entirely missing from these results, & are being reported as having the results of other precincts.
@CoatsandLinen 🚨 IDP (& so also media outlets republishing IDP #s) is inaccurately reporting same exact results for "Davenport 52" & "Bettendorf 52" (per @CoatsandLinen and I)
Story below confirms the reported results are those of B52.
So DAVENPORT 52 is missing. 🚨
Story below confirms the reported results are those of B52.
So DAVENPORT 52 is missing. 🚨
@CoatsandLinen This person tweeted results of "Davenport 52" on Monday (6 days ago) at 2:42am. Have not been able to verify, but timestamp makes at least confident this isn't fake produced over past few days. If correct, missing result are 2-2-2 Warren/Sanders/Buttigieg.
@CoatsandLinen Results the IDP (and thru it CNN, ABC, etc) report for Davenport 52 & Bettendorf 52 combined:
—Buttigieg 6, Sanders 6, Klobuchar 4, Biden 4
Actual results:
—Buttigieg 5, Sanders 5, Warren 2, Biden 2, Klobuchar 2
(Boosts Sanders (and Warren) over Pete in popular vote.)
—Buttigieg 6, Sanders 6, Klobuchar 4, Biden 4
Actual results:
—Buttigieg 5, Sanders 5, Warren 2, Biden 2, Klobuchar 2
(Boosts Sanders (and Warren) over Pete in popular vote.)
@CoatsandLinen more 🚨: Sioux City 20 is missing from the IDP results; instead Sioux City 5 is reported twice. (And incorrectly.)
A local paper reported this yesterday. The real Sioux City 20, which is missing, "overwhelmingly voted for Bernie Sanders."
siouxlandproud.com/news/sioux-cit…
A local paper reported this yesterday. The real Sioux City 20, which is missing, "overwhelmingly voted for Bernie Sanders."
siouxlandproud.com/news/sioux-cit…
@CoatsandLinen The chair of the Woodbury County Democratic Party (where Sioux City is located) is quoted in that newspaper saying that they have informed the IDP of this error.
As of Saturday night, the IDP still shows the results of Sioux City 20 as tho it was Sioux City 5.
As of Saturday night, the IDP still shows the results of Sioux City 20 as tho it was Sioux City 5.
@CoatsandLinen What we know so far about the Sioux City mess.
What the IDP is reporting for Sioux City 5 & 20 combined:
Biden 8-Sanders 6-Buttigieg 4.
What it should be:
Biden 3-Sanders 3-Buttigieg 2. Plus unknown delegates of a precinct that we only know Sanders won.
[Big drop for Biden.]
What the IDP is reporting for Sioux City 5 & 20 combined:
Biden 8-Sanders 6-Buttigieg 4.
What it should be:
Biden 3-Sanders 3-Buttigieg 2. Plus unknown delegates of a precinct that we only know Sanders won.
[Big drop for Biden.]
@CoatsandLinen 🚨 An Iowa reporter was in Sioux City 20 on Monday night. (This is one of numoerous precincts that is entirely absent from the IDP results.)
He reported that Sanders got 34 of 68 votes in first round; Warren & Biden were only other viable candidates.
He reported that Sanders got 34 of 68 votes in first round; Warren & Biden were only other viable candidates.
@CoatsandLinen What we know about Sioux City
What IDP is reporting for Sioux City 5 & 20 combined:
Biden 8-Sanders 6-Buttigieg 4.
What it *likely* is, per reporting from Mon. & Thur (see above):
Sanders 6: Biden 4-Buttigieg 2-Warren 1
(So -0.84 SDE Biden, -0.42 SDE Pete, +0.21 SDE Warren.)
What IDP is reporting for Sioux City 5 & 20 combined:
Biden 8-Sanders 6-Buttigieg 4.
What it *likely* is, per reporting from Mon. & Thur (see above):
Sanders 6: Biden 4-Buttigieg 2-Warren 1
(So -0.84 SDE Biden, -0.42 SDE Pete, +0.21 SDE Warren.)
@CoatsandLinen as a coda to this thread, I will add these estimates I tweeted separately on the 'takeaways' out of the *missing precincts* in Sioux Falls and Davenport:
@CoatsandLinen Based on some replies, I want everyone to get to verify this for themselves. [Many have.]
Here confirm that, as of now, D52/B52 & Sioux City 5/20 are duplicate: results.thecaucuses.org
Links to reports of real results in thread above. (Still chasing other missing precincts.)
Here confirm that, as of now, D52/B52 & Sioux City 5/20 are duplicate: results.thecaucuses.org
Links to reports of real results in thread above. (Still chasing other missing precincts.)
@CoatsandLinen For sake of completion of this thread, I am dropping in this tweet about a 3rd similar situation—a missing precinct whose results are still unknown, but where the duplicated precinct was favorable to Sanders. More tomorrow. (And now good night for real.)
@CoatsandLinen I wish to end thread above with info that all three situations that @CoatsandLinen and I reported on in this particular thread last night were corrected today
There are still somewhat related issues lurking, as well as many other errors, however:
There are still somewhat related issues lurking, as well as many other errors, however:
