Some companies are reasonably good at strategy and figuring out where the opportunities are...but they’re not great at working small. Result? ... (1/n)
Other companies are reasonably good at working small, but can’t think beyond two week increments (or quarters even). Result? ... (2/n)
People often equate “thinking big” to grandiose, “innovative”, moonshots. That’s not it... (3/n)
It isn’t (necessarily) about BIG PROJECTS, though I guess given the right context that might be the best plan of action (4/n)
That’s true-ish, but without the “think big”, you become a well-oiled feature factory (5/n)
That’s true-ish, but it belittles/marginalizes the work and practice required to “work small” (6/n)