Thread by @DLTPandu

I really don't understand the negative feedback on @jwolpert #Magicbus announcement.
This is exactly what I want to see coming up. Too many people are too used and hungry to/for
basic partnership announcements.. thats the 2017 ico craze way. #Chainlink was never like this.

Chainlink behaves like an Amazon in 1990 or Tesla in 2010. Stop waiting for partnership headlines
and read what the fuck people like Wolpert are telling you. The difference for startups and dapps
and how the evolve with tech integration is completely different.

A synthetix tier project or Maker
can decide in an instant to go for Chainlink as Oracle solution. But THE companies. The big boys,
they don't go solo and say "yup we go with LINK". They do exactly what we see for months..
lead/join consortiums,

build frameworks/standards and then go. Just listen for a second
what @pbrody from EY said literally ages ago already:
Just as many other people like Brody, they have been focusing ETH mainnet since the beginning really.
They want mainnet ethereum.

They GET it.
Chainlink is finally known for being THAT solution any crypto project needs and since a few months,
people also start to realize it goes way beyond that. It's connectivity way beyond blockchain.
To all general webservices, clouds and ERP systems. It's not

just involved, it's key infrastructure to reliably connect these.
So the next step from just being used by the crypto startups inside the crypto space..
we need to get into these tech-stachs/frameworks by the big boys.. And EXACTLY THIS IS HAPPENING.
We have seen Consensys

referencing the OLE Tech Stack, involving Chainlink. Look at the customer/partners list of Consensys.
We have seen HyperLedger referencing Chainlink as default Oracle for the Avalon Framework. Look at their customers list
We have seen Chainlink being the default Oracle in the

Ethereum Enterprise Alliance EMINENT Task Force. Look at the EEA Member List.
And now on the Magicbus as well, focused on connecting exactly these big boys and their actual in-production systems to want to connect
to and with blockchains by Chainlink and Unibright

via the announced Magicbus.
Read carefully:
@yorkerhodes , Principal Program Manager, Blockchain at Microsoft, says:
"With the Baseline protocol, we are developing enterprise processes THAT ARE ECOSYSTEM READY because they are being built in a truly blockchain-native manner.

When delivered on the public Ethereum network, this will drive adoption and the whole ecosystem."
So I don't know what the fuck you are talking about when asking 'how's that news?'

"The Baseline Protocol code will be released later this month and a technical steering committee is also being formed. The committee will include the likes of EY, Microsoft, Chainlink..."

It will be released later this month. It's ready. This has been in planning for long

It's not a fucking IOTA Qubic you will never hear about again. It's there, it's made and supported and used by the big boys

But still, I would like to see a high level explanation on baseline @jwolpert. Smart Contracts themselves are not that abstract anymore, but anything beyond that IS. Even Chainlink is still pretty abstract and complex to imagine. I hope we see this with or pre code-release