“The IPCC report is a slightly dishonest take on the situation because it achieves 1.5° only with immense negative emissions, which will never happen at global scale. Not a good answer to an existential threat to civilisation.”
— Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Schellnhuber
[THREAD 1/4]
— Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Schellnhuber
[THREAD 1/4]
“We cannot optimise ourselves out of the #ClimateCrisis. There will be disruptive things and processes. But this will be positive disruption. If there are climate tipping points, humanity can strike back with nonlinearities as well.”
— Prof Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
[THREAD 2/4]
— Prof Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
[THREAD 2/4]
“We scientists publish in papers nobody can read, except some colleagues. And society gives us billions of euros so we can play with our curiosity. That’s not good enough. In times of deep crisis, scientists have to take a stance.”
— Prof. Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
[THREAD 3/4]
— Prof. Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
[THREAD 3/4]
This was climate scientist Hans Joachim Schellnhuber interviewed by Prof. Michael Sterner (@prof_sterner) in 2019. Full interview here:
There are more statements on the IPCC assumptions by @MichaelEMann which you can find in this interview:
[THREAD 4/4]
There are more statements on the IPCC assumptions by @MichaelEMann which you can find in this interview:
[THREAD 4/4]
