This piece fits with what I have heard.
A clique around Govt designed a high-risk ‘herd immunity’ strategy...
...that was shielded from peer review/ outside advice (arrogance about ‘the science’).
Then they realised they screwed up and pivoted hard. buzzfeed.com/alexwickham/10…
A clique around Govt designed a high-risk ‘herd immunity’ strategy...
...that was shielded from peer review/ outside advice (arrogance about ‘the science’).
Then they realised they screwed up and pivoted hard. buzzfeed.com/alexwickham/10…
Science is an international team game.
🌍 🧬 🧫 🔬🧑🏽🔬👨🏿🔬👩🏻💻👨🏼🔬👨🏻💻
It is not a nationalistic “we’ll prove we’re smarter than you” game.
🧪 🖕🧐
🌍 🧬 🧫 🔬🧑🏽🔬👨🏿🔬👩🏻💻👨🏼🔬👨🏻💻
It is not a nationalistic “we’ll prove we’re smarter than you” game.
🧪 🖕🧐
The big question for me is... why did the UK *and the US* pivot at the same time on the same finding of a single (outlier) modelling group?
Were the US & UK sharing a “we’re cleverer than @WHO & world” strategy? If so - who were the link people connecting this arrogant approach?
Were the US & UK sharing a “we’re cleverer than @WHO & world” strategy? If so - who were the link people connecting this arrogant approach?
This below goes a long way to answering it for me.
(That and, incidentally, Matthew Elliott appearing on Marr on March 15 to discuss US-UK trade deal and coronavirus)
(That and, incidentally, Matthew Elliott appearing on Marr on March 15 to discuss US-UK trade deal and coronavirus)
