My Authors
Read all threads
Briefed ethicists on #coronavirus. Most agree we should not allocate resources on first-come, first-served basis. So do we try to save the most individual lives or give priority to patients likely to survive the longest after treatment? Key question: How do we maximize benefit?
Example: In the setting of scarce #coronavirus vaccine, should we prioritize inoculation of older patients because COVID19 outcomes are worse in this group? Or prioritize young people because it may be better way to limit spread of the virus? Or should we just use a lottery?
New paper in @NEJM provides some guidance. Authors argue we should: 1) apply the same principles to all #COVID19 & non–Covid19 patients; 2) be responsive to evidence; 3) give priority to research participants & frontline healthcare workers. nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Matt McCarthy

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!