I have in my heart & in my head the voices of the dozens of (mostly) women patients who tried hard, for years, to bring their heath in line by following the guidance they were given.
--eat less and move more, as if these two things are independent of each other
--count calories in/out, as if health is a math problem
--drink more water, as if that can nourish an underfed body
--write down everything, as if this would "Make It So."
And they did. They tried harder. They wrote everything down. It still didn't work.
When they found out that carb reduction DID work - without hunger or counting or scolding - they were (I think justifiably) angry.
By the time I met her, she'd been hungry for DECADES.
And I'm not even going to start talking about the people who have lost limbs, eyesight & kidneys to an intervention for T2DM that INSISTS that fruit & starches must be included in any diet in order for it to be considered "healthy."
His doctor put him on a low-carb diet (Why? Bc his doc was Old School.)
I knew that my dad would likely keep his toes, eyesight & kidneys. (He did.)
I wasn't sad about MY dad. But other kids had parents who did not get the same option.
I didn't have an answer.
For many of them, it was too late in terms of amputations. Toes - sometimes feet - were already gone.
You are right that low-carb advocates have some extremist in their midst. Folks who want low-carb for everyone all the time, etc.
But mainstream nutrition has the same kind of extremism: Folks who think grains/cereals/legumes/fruit for everyone all the time is the *only* way to be healthy.
But you can't discount or deny that many RDs, now & in the past, have been not just dismissive, but adamantly AGAINST low carb as an option.
I'd like to change that. Maybe you would like to change that too?