Well, for starters, we know quite a bit about @NHSEngland's 'dashboard(s)': back in March, @MattHancock gave it powers to DEMAND confidential patient information from care providers*, for (broadly defined) "#COVID19 purposes"...
...and we know @NHSEngland's hoovering up *at least* 70 different datasets into its #DataStore (the list at data.england.nhs.uk/covid-19/ is no longer comprehensive due to the controversial contents of some of the datasets).
Everyone's a bit vague about what happens next, but we do know that it's not just @PalantirTech but Dom Cummings' favourite firm, @faculty_ai, plus @Deloitte & @McKinsey 👇 who are making/linking the #models...
...which '#interpret', '#predict' or otherwise #process the data that's been fed into the Foundry platform; the *results* of which processing are presented to decision-makers via the '#dashboards'.
And remember, at this point, we're still only just talking about @NHSEngland's...
Ask yourself - what do they *actually* show? At BEST this is #partial data, of varying #quality, some with significant #timelags...
...being fed to #models, #algorithms & combinations thereof ('daisy-chained' together) each #parameter of which is a '#knob' that can be twiddled to affect the output.
And what is that output? The idea they're working on/from a "single source of truth" is patently ridiculous...
...it's an #OfficialAbstraction, comprising only of that which they've CHOSEN to #capture - notably lots in #health, but virtually nothing in #SocialCare - or can even be bothered to collect.
Is what they're looking at "real"? Is it even close to #GroundTruth?
And as whoever-it-is fiddles with the #knobs to try to #predict...
...the effect of a new #policy or #rule (of 6), to what extent are they "following the #science" rather than juggling a bunch of #DataDriven delusions?
Things built out of #logic may appear to be #logical; much as things using #bits are #digital. Neither NECESSARILY makes 'em...
...any good. And it certainly doesn't make them any more #true.
N.B. I'm not saying we shouldn't TRY; we should! But what we do should be done openly, being honest about the limitations of our #knowledge and of our #capacity. Not shrouded in secrecy, lies and half-truths.
/ends
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Nah. This is another puff piece on the #WaitingList pilot, details of which @NHSEngland published - without daring to mention @PalantirTech - over ten months ago...
To be clear, 30 individual NHS Trusts* are using #Palantir#Foundry to manage elective care waiting lists, not patients' entire medical histories - largely by what Ministers have called "cleansing" the data:
Why is this so important? Because #SharedCareRecords - which every new #ICS* is supposed to have - include your #GPdata, which @NHSEngland has been trying to get hold of for years (most recently last summer)...
So let’s talk about where things got up to with your #HealthData, before Rishi Sunak started talking about the need to generate trust in Government with “#integrity” and “#accountability”…
N.B. The chair of NHS Digital announced today’s meeting would be the last public meeting of the Board...
With the news that the Government is rushing through @NHSEngland’s takeover of the statutory safe haven (@NHSDigital) with about the level of planning that went into the 'fiscal event', where exactly *are* things as the former/new Sec State starts work?
First, beginning on page 158, are some Directions that @NHSEngland must know will be HIGHLY controversial - given they are telling @NHSDigital to use @PalantirTech's #Foundry to collect *patient level identifiable data* from hospitals...
I'll tweet as I do a read-through, but even these first two paragraphs are incoherent, e.g. "...in a way that will enable." Enable what?
And if @NHSEngland Directs NHSD to use #Palantir, NHSE is *determining the purposes and means of processing* - i.e. it is a #DataController...