, 18 tweets, 6 min read Read on Twitter
1/18 The new Legatum paper covers a wide range of topics. This thread focuses on the WTO & repeated references to the UK being a WTO leader
2/18 A lot of it deals with issues such as regulations and standards. Others may have comments on those. I’ll stick to broader WTO topics
3/18 It has some valid points. But with so much misreading, eg on WTO negotiations, it’s questionable how solid the rest of the paper is
4/18 Eg this. The UK can “explain” as much as it likes. It won’t be the first. Securing WTO consensus on what that means is something else
5/18 Back in 2001, WTO members did agree on the need to liberalise. They launched new talks with this declaration. wto.org/english/thewto…
6/18 Result? The “Doha Round” reached no agreement except in limited areas. Would a UK explanation have helped? wto.org/english/tratop…
7/18 WTO members can’t even agree if the Doha Round is over or not. Nairobi 2015: would UK explanation have helped? wto.org/english/thewto…
8/18 “Trade leader” again, but hang on a minute. “WTO members” includes the EU and its member states. WTO = 164 members = 164 trade agendas
9/18 No problem here. @JulianUNWTO and @UKMissionGeneva are doing this already
10/18 But too late here. The UK and EU are already working jointly on this. Difficult to separate them tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2017/10/07/pri…
11/18 This is nonsense. Other members have already challenged “rectification”. UK and EU are “other WTO members” for each other’s TRQs too
12/18 By the way, the reason for the UK-EU common WTO position is Phase 1 of the EU’s Art.50 negotiating guidelines consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press…
13/18 Finally on a UK-EU free trade agreement (FTA). Telling the WTO early on about it will almost certainly make no difference because …
14/18 … the WTO committee of WTO members dealing with this has almost no teeth … wto.org/english/tratop…
15/18 … Although the committee can be useful for clarifying facts. These are minutes from the latest meeting docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/F…
16/18 Anyway, UK & EU are supposed to notify an FTA “promptly” (from GATT: contracting parties now = WTO members) wto.org/english/docs_e…
17/18 In practice, par (b) is unworkable. No comments made by other countries has ever had any impact, at least in WTO years (from 1995)
18/18 Details of a UK-EU deal will be important “for information only” unless there’s a serious violation eg passporting-only in services
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Peter Ungphakorn
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!