1) This guy’s argument is absurd. Judges are expected to be unbiased but they still excuse themselves where there is a conflict of interest. How he can think that these “investigators”, who are obviously diametrically opposed to the President’s ideology AND probably view the
2) shocking election results as a dagger to their heart & belief system, could be objective is ridiculous.
Also, the person the President “shockingly”beat was
the person they believe was the “rightful” heir to the “throne”. AND the previous president,whose ideology they probably
Also, the person the President “shockingly”beat was
the person they believe was the “rightful” heir to the “throne”. AND the previous president,whose ideology they probably
3) worshipped, was still out there denouncing the new President. Hell, the investigators may feel that it is their patriotic DUTY to bring down this President.
And don’t forget the lengths the DOJ & Obama Admin participated in making sure the tools were in place to monitor and
And don’t forget the lengths the DOJ & Obama Admin participated in making sure the tools were in place to monitor and
4) sabotage President Trump’s new Administration.
Then there is Mueller... what kind of judgement does this man have that he exclusively chose Clinton flunkies? He didn’t know? Well that might be even worse. He is in charge of an investigation that has domestic & worldwide
Then there is Mueller... what kind of judgement does this man have that he exclusively chose Clinton flunkies? He didn’t know? Well that might be even worse. He is in charge of an investigation that has domestic & worldwide
5) implications~ probably the biggest of our lifetimes and Mueller didn’t think vetting these people thoroughly was important? ABSURD.
At this point who in the hell would believe a damn thing from this sham?
At this point who in the hell would believe a damn thing from this sham?
