It is intended to show that a 'hard border' is not just determined by its visibility. And this is before we even touch on NTBs etc.
It is primarily a means of enhancing efficiency.
It cannot make a hard border 'frictionless'.
It requires physical infrastructure. It does not obviate the need for inspections etc
IMO the draft Protocol is narrow interpretation of Joint Report.
UK in a CU wd be minimum to keep E/W open as possible.
Any solution relies on a clear distinction between constitutional/political borders & economic/regulatory ones.
[Each of those slides is deliberately simple but let me know of any glaring errors!]