Profile picture
Simon Usherwood @Usherwood
, 15 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
Let's work through why Cabinet/CON are fighting over which of two plans that EU rejects is happening:

1/
Both Customs Partnership (CP) and Maximum Facilitation (MF) have been rejected so far by EU as underdeveloped and probably unviable. So why persist?

2/
Different levels at work here, so let's try to unpack them

3/
First point is that I'm going to reject ignorance of EU position as an option: it's been said enough and those involved know enough that this explanation doesn't fly

4/
Secondly, it reflects v.different views of UK's future relationship (@tconnellyRTE piece was excellent on this: rte.ie/news/2018/0505…)

5/
MF means being out of Customs Union, but trying to keep barriers to a minimum, while CP is being aligned to CU and keeping v.close

'Win' this battle and you get to set a tone

6/
Importantly, many in UK see CP/MF paths as viable, but needing some more time to work up (although neither is being, right now). For CP, that points to staying in a CU until then, while MF points to leaving, then working to drop barriers

7/
But CP/MF is also symbolically important, as CON think about post-Mar 2019/post-May period. Need to lay markers down now, to show how they would have done things differently

8/
As someone here pointed out, Brexit will never fail, just never be implemented correctly. So need to get in early to shape that narrative

9/
At another level, CP/MF matters because it'll be taken into Art.50 process. Even if not viable, it sets boundary for negotiation, so matters for feedback into rest of process

10/
Most obvious element here is Irish dimension: choice on CP/MF affects options for borders. For those CONs feeling IE is getting to shape too much, so this is way to run up new interference

11/
As of last week, CP/MF also is means to cement changing balance in Cabinet, w loss of Rudd. Working on May to toughen position will continue right through to Mar 19

12/
But, finally, a caveat.

If triggers were going to be pulled, then they would have been. From ERG, from Johnson et al

13/
That they haven't been suggests that current situation suits everyone:
- get a deal
- remove May
- complain about May
- work out a plan for UK-EU relations later

14/
In sum, EU is waiting for Godot

/end
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Simon Usherwood
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!