1) See, I'm torn here.
On the one hand: Fuck QAnon.
On the other hand: Fuck Wikileaks.
Actually, you know what, I'm not torn. Fuck them both.
On the one hand: Fuck QAnon.
On the other hand: Fuck Wikileaks.
Actually, you know what, I'm not torn. Fuck them both.
2) Let's start with QAnon. I've never liked QAnon. 'I'm a highly placed government official!' So was WHAnon. And the other WHAnon. And the OTHER WHAnon. Yeah, didn't you hear, there were like 3 running around during the transition and the early months of his administration
3) Alllllll posting to /pol/. Allll posting vague crap that wasn't any actual actionable intelligence. All puffing up the importance of /pol/ get /pol/tards feeling important and righteous.
4) Has anyone ever asked, if this Q fucker was performing some vital role, why was it always vague bullshit that kept being wrong or never provided an actual answer? Why was everything vague breadcrumbs? Why the fuck would he go to /pol/ of all places?
5) Now Wikileaks is calling Q a 'deep state' operation. REALLY. Some /pol/tard scamming a bunch of other /pol/tards is a deep state operation. REALLY.
6) You want to know what Wikileaks has done recently? Published a bunch of John Podesta's emails. And before that? Published a bunch of diplomatic cables. They didn't get it themselves, they didn't do shit like run through and check stuff and do investigating of their own
7) Just threw it all up on their site and let the chaos fucking happen.
8) Then when they DO try to be journalists? They smear our soldiers as war criminals using a 5 minute edited down clip of a far larger video file that shows our soldiers WEREN'T war criminals, a bunch of fucking idiots were standing around with insurgents in a city battle
9) Then started walking with a bunch of equipment TOWARDS a us position that had been under fire from those same insurgents all day, and the helicopter pilots STILL had to ask for permission SEVERAL times before they were allowed to open fire.
10) If Wikileaks had any fucking integrity, they would have taken the information they had received, interviewed and gotten together as much supporting information as possible, like say getting fbi agents to talk to them about pedophile network codewords
11) And then used THAT to bust the blatantly illegal shit John Podesta was a part of.
No. You know what happened instead?
They just threw it all out there, let a bunch of /pol/tards run wild with the data, and suddenly a random pizza shop has underground sex dungeons.
No. You know what happened instead?
They just threw it all out there, let a bunch of /pol/tards run wild with the data, and suddenly a random pizza shop has underground sex dungeons.
12) THAT'S NOT JOURNALISM. THAT'S NOT HONESTY. That is RECKLESS disregard for the pursuit of justice. Wikileaks has the manpower and had the information necessary to actually do some good in the world, but now, John Podesta has probably established an ironclad legal defense, JIC.
13) And the diplomatic cables? Probably got some people killed, ultimately changed NOTHING of how anything operates, and was released in mass unredacted in retaliation for Assange being charged for sex without a condom, which were it a crime in the US would result in mass arrests
14) Seriously, buying condoms suck. You buy the extra large and you either have the old lady cashier saying 'honey you're exaggerating' or giving you a dirty look or you know they're laughing at you because condom companies exaggerate the size on their box.
15) ANYWAYS. Where was I. Oh, that's right. Let's talk about information being put out there that ACTUALLY generated positive changes. Let's talk about what Wikileaks and QAnon won't admit they aren't talking about.
16) The panama papers were put out by the @ICIJorg, the International Community of Investigative Journalists.
17) Unlike Assange hiding in a goddamn embassy for skipping bail, these people ACTUALLY put their lives on the line, for example, the Panama Papers journalist was killed by a carbomb working on ANOTHER story. theguardian.com/world/2017/oct…
18) The bank she was investigating? At the center of an Iranian money laundering scheme to fund IRGC operations all over the world, like say South America.
19) The OIG, the part of the government that really does not get the credit it deserves, brought out a report about all kinds of hinky shit happening at the @DHSgov under Obama. oversight.gov/node/15937
20) Friday. This was out FRIDAY. No one talked about it. Didn't make any news. Wikileaks sure as fuck didn't find it. QAnon didn't talk to you about that shit.
21) "DHS OIG’s investigative findings
indicate that some of FLETC’s senior
managers, including former Director
Connie Patrick, failed to exercise the
judgment, stewardship, and leadership
expected of DHS senior officials."
indicate that some of FLETC’s senior
managers, including former Director
Connie Patrick, failed to exercise the
judgment, stewardship, and leadership
expected of DHS senior officials."
22) "Two specific issues involving former Director Patrick’s travel and the hiring of her husband at FLETC exemplify the broader issues uncovered by DHS OIG’s investigation."
23) "DHS OIG’s investigation determined that JP was hired to a term position with LELI on January 3, 2010 and completed the term on September 11, 2011
— all during Patrick’s tenure as Director of FLETC. "
— all during Patrick’s tenure as Director of FLETC. "
24) She was from the Bush era, all the travel and nepotism shenanigans happened during the Obama era apparently according to the OIG, and she unceremoniously retired one year ago due to the OIG inspection. Not that anyone mentioned this. cnn.com/2017/05/01/pol…
25) The Swamp IS being drained. Things ARE happening. But Wikileaks? QAnon? Those motherfuckers aren't going to tell you any of that.
26) They're not going to tell you the good guys are winning. They're going to SCARE you. "Watch out! The Deep State from the Black Lagoon is gonna jump out and GETCHA!"
27) Fuck your fear. Drink bourbon. Get ready, Quodverum.com is coming soon.
/end
