From your high school classes, do you recall the image of an atom where electrons revolve around the nucleus (just like planets go around the Sun)?
IT WAS WRONG, and here's why.
Electrons are not tiny spheres. Instead, they’re like a cloud spread around the nucleus. In fact, even the cloud analogy is wrong
Note that the equation is not just a mathematical description, it is what an electron _really_ is.
For example, in the electrons-as-tiny-spheres analogy, it’s impossible to understand what the word ‘sphere’ means at an atomic level.
I wrote about this in a post titled philosophy is politics invertedpassion.com/philosophy-is-…
If you buy into the ‘fitness landscape’ analogy, you start thinking of evolution as finding the fittest organism in a fixed environment. In the real world, the environment is not fixed at all.
The movement of an organism from point A to point B changes the terrain and it’s impossible to represent that in any manner that’s intuitive
Ironically, it's an analogy: THE MAP IS NOT THE TERRITORY wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/The_map_i…
In our day to day thinking, we are programmed to refer to our mind maps for reasoning and hence always assume the map as reality.
invertedpassion.com/hacks-to-avoid…
I know @kunalb11 loves analogies, but I'm suspicious of them. Analogies are easy to remember and that seducing nature makes us fall for them
Though it’s unfortunate that catchphrases anecessary evil for grabbing attention as nobody wants to read ‘some drugs are really bad, some are OK and some are good’
And due to confirmation bias, the explanations we use end up becoming stronger and harder to dislodge with time.
See the world as it is: full of complexity, with multiple systems interacting with each other in complicated and unpredictable ways.
I blog all my tweetstorms on invertedpassion.com <- SUBSCRIBE for email updates.
RT and share this thread to people who LOVE analogies :)