Check out the dates (credit @TheLastRefuge2)
Start
November 2015 – the FBI notified the DNC one of the DNC’s computers was now transmitting information to Russia.
End
April 28, 2016 – DNC IT Staff detected and ultimately confirmed access to the DNC network by unauthorized users.
Start
November 2015 – the FBI notified the DNC one of the DNC’s computers was now transmitting information to Russia.
End
April 28, 2016 – DNC IT Staff detected and ultimately confirmed access to the DNC network by unauthorized users.
Start and end
November 2015-April 2016 – The FBI and DOJ’s National Security Division (NSD) used private contractors to access raw FISA information using “To” and “From” FISA-702(16) & “About” FISA-702(17) queries.
November 2015-April 2016 – The FBI and DOJ’s National Security Division (NSD) used private contractors to access raw FISA information using “To” and “From” FISA-702(16) & “About” FISA-702(17) queries.
Crowdstrike was an “FBI contractor” in 2015 and 2016. - CTH
"The IC Report concluded: “In July 2015, Russian Intelligence gained access to Democratic National Committee (DNC) networks and maintained that access until at least June 2016”. [Actual date was determined to be “since at least July 27, 2015”]"
"In April 2016, another set of Russian Intelligence Agents successfully hacked into the DNC."
"The DNC claims the GRU (Main Intelligence Directorate) hacked the DNC servers and Guccifer 2.0 distributed them on behalf of Russian Intelligence." - Dated May 18, 2018
Funny that is exactly what the indictment said.
Is the DNC running the show?
Funny that is exactly what the indictment said.
Is the DNC running the show?
From DNC lawsuit:
"On June 15, 2016, GRU Operative #1 (Guccifer 2.0 – website here) widely disseminated a trove of stolen documents to the public, claiming they were DNC material."
Odd just like the indictment
"On June 15, 2016, GRU Operative #1 (Guccifer 2.0 – website here) widely disseminated a trove of stolen documents to the public, claiming they were DNC material."
Odd just like the indictment
Notice the language here:
"Both Crowdstrike’s forensic analysis and the U.S. Government concluded that the DNC’s computer systems had been hacked by two independent, sophisticated state-sponsored adversaries."
***Not Gov't forensic analysis
"Both Crowdstrike’s forensic analysis and the U.S. Government concluded that the DNC’s computer systems had been hacked by two independent, sophisticated state-sponsored adversaries."
***Not Gov't forensic analysis
Which is why POTUS says this:
"The DNC Lawsuit glosses over the 2015 intrusion and focuses on the April 2016 hack. I find the lack of detail regarding events in 2015 and early 2016 to be suspect."
Why was the US IC letting Russia do this if they knew about it?
Why was the US IC letting Russia do this if they knew about it?
April 18 2016 – Rogers shut down FBI/NSD contractor access to the FISA Search System.
April 18, 2016 – Russia launched a 2nd phase of its cyberattack on DNC servers located in Virginia/Washington DC. This attack was executed by GRU agents.
Was the DNC Hack a cover for FISA abuse?
April 18, 2016 – Russia launched a 2nd phase of its cyberattack on DNC servers located in Virginia/Washington DC. This attack was executed by GRU agents.
Was the DNC Hack a cover for FISA abuse?
"October 9, 2016 – John Podesta was contacted by the FBI regarding his email hack. Podesta stated he was only contacted by the FBI that one time."
This is off the charts odd. So the IC knows Russia is attacking but once again leaves alone vital info or sits on it? (see Papa)
This is off the charts odd. So the IC knows Russia is attacking but once again leaves alone vital info or sits on it? (see Papa)
Also why was the FBI and DOJ/NSD stonewalling Rogers efforts to expose the 702 queries abuse?
"FBI had disclosed raw FISA information, including but not limited to Section 702-acquired information, to a [Redacted] Compliance Report at 92. [Redacted] is part of the [Redacted] and “is largely staffed by private contractors” [Redacted] certain [Redacted] contractors..
... had access to raw FISA information on FBI storage systems [Redacted]."
"The apparent purpose for the FBI’s granting such access was to receive analytical assistance from [Redacted]. Nonetheless, the [Redacted] contractors had access to raw FISA information that went ..
"The apparent purpose for the FBI’s granting such access was to receive analytical assistance from [Redacted]. Nonetheless, the [Redacted] contractors had access to raw FISA information that went ..
well beyond what was necessary to respond to the FBI’s requests; [Redacted]. The FBI discontinued the above-described access to raw FISA information as of April 18, 2016."
Trump knows who and what those redacted things are.
My bet it's CrowdStrike, as others have said.
Trump knows who and what those redacted things are.
My bet it's CrowdStrike, as others have said.
How are we to believe the IC assessments when they are/were suppressing facts, not examining key evidence and people, showed disdain towards Trump and affection towards Hillary, relied on evidence done by an outside entity, that was hired by the DNC & which it has close ties too?
CrowdStrike has a major conflict of interest here and any of it's evidence would be thrown out in court. The FBI knows this, so does Mueller, so does any serious DA, so why would they keep using it?
IMO it's a cover up.
IMO it's a cover up.
