Profile picture
Dave Ambrose @daveambrose
, 9 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
a founder in a very competitive, VC-backed marekt stopped by today to give an update on her business. she’s been building the co. for a few years.

her update stressed a few themes that I keep thinking about about the oddities of venture capital, so sharing them in this thread.
her competitors raised ~$100m+ from VCs but she struggled to raise ~$4m.

she struggled because:

1. the co. wasn’t a “perceived” leader by investors, so raising was hard.
2. investors believed the market was “winner take all” and only wanted to make positions in a “leader”.
she had either a choice to give up and sunset the company or build something that was sustainable. she chose the latter.

getting to profitability forced her to:

1. focus
2. constrain
3. do one thing well, i.e. deliver revenue
while she was acquiring paying customers, her competitors continued to raise capital to gain market share. by market share, these were customers who were not paying but on trials. interesting "breaks" started to occur for her.
these competitors started to take action that's required (often) by VC-backed + perceived "winner take all" markets.

1. competitors ramped sales people so quickly that customer churn occurred.
2. market share != always mean great unit economics
3. valuations didn't match metrics
so, now around 1.5-2 years passed and she's still growing her company profitably by 80% YoY (not 200% YoY like her competitors were doing when they raised VC). she's starting to notice competitors are laying off talent and now struggle to raise.
what was interesting now, after a few years since she started and making the "hard" decision to become profitable, was that her business started to look like it was really ready for funding:

1. she had repeatable sales
2. positive unit economics
3. great, growing customer base
in something she didn't expect (and when she shared this, I just 😀): "we had to make these hard decisions to stay alive and funny enough, and I guess that's how timing works, we're now inundated w. VCs wanting to write 8-figure checks because we outlasted."
sharing this story because I think it's just so easy for either a VC or an entrepreneur to be measured (or focused) on growing at all costs, to gain market share or to win "mega" rounds. that's not winning.

winning is become durable and sustainable, delivering customer value.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Dave Ambrose
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!