Yes, of course.
Asking the question—and having a national conversation about the answer—could save the nation from fascism.
Here’s what I mean.
#TrumpIsAFascist
What do I mean see 👇
Another reason the strategy works: Refuting a lie reinforces the lie and gives the lie airtime.
Even people who didn't think she committed a crime felt a nagging doubt.
How did the hoodwinking happen?
Also HRC defenders were forced to keep saying: “Hillary did not commit a crime.”
The brain has a way of dropping the word “not.”
Simply framing the question: “Did Hillary commit a crime” is damaging.
Timothy Snyder @TimothyDSnyder, Jason Stanley @jasonintrator, Madeline Albright @madeleine & others offer expert analysis on the question of whether Trump is a fascist.
The video same tactics as the chart: Confuse people with absurd definitions of fascism, mix in some whataboutism and random distortions.
But every time RWers say “Trump is not a fascist” they are reinforcing the possibility that Trump IS a fascist.
It’s not the conversation they want to be having.
And then launch into a discussion about the relationship between fascist uprisings and lies.
When Trump implies that minorities are not fully American, we say, “Victimizing minorities is a feature of fascism.”
See where I’m going with this?
If he falls to 36%, the GOP will lose big in the midterms.
Trump is now at 40%.
Both sides are fighting for that (sway-able) 4%
projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval…
Let’s force the Trump-GOP to own their fascism.
Here's how a few scholars define fascism:
From Paxton: Fascism is a cult of leadership.
(Think of it as the ultimate in skepticism and relativism).