Democrats and the Rule of Lawyers spectator.org/democrats-and-…
Cicero is remembered today as a great Roman orator, but few recall that he was a lawyer by trade. In fact, he first rose to public prominence by using his rhetorical skills to secure the acquittal of a man accused of patricide.
Cicero’s eloquence eventually enabled him to rise to the rank of Consul, in which capacity he presided over the execution without trial of five Senators. He was exiled for this unlawful act and, at length, was himself illegally executed.
There’s a lesson here for the Democrats who increasingly employ lubricious lawyers to circumvent the rule of law.
Cicero’s career, which contributed to the republic’s collapse, came to mind when @SenBillNelson hired attorney @MarcEElias — a “recount specialist” with ties to Hillary Clinton and George Soros — to sue the state of Florida over the outcome of its recent senatorial race.
Elias made his intentions clear upon arriving in the Sunshine State: “We’re doing this not just because it’s automatic… we’re doing it to win.” And he does indeed know how to “win” recounts. He was the perpetrator of Al Franken’s notorious 2008 Senate “victory.”
As the Washington Post put it in a 2016 profile:
"Elias’s personal breakthrough came when he represented Al Franken in the recount of the 2008 Minnesota Senate race. It was the longest recount in history — 8 mos — and resulted in a 312-vote win for Franken."
"Elias’s personal breakthrough came when he represented Al Franken in the recount of the 2008 Minnesota Senate race. It was the longest recount in history — 8 mos — and resulted in a 312-vote win for Franken."
"Since then, Elias has been the go-to lawyer for a string of Democrats in recounts and has never lost."
The same Post profile documents the Soros connection: “With a multimillion-dollar commitment from liberal mega-donor George Soros, Elias is challenging laws that, he argues, diminish the impact of important Democratic Party constituencies.”
Not surprisingly, his arrival in FL was taken as an indication that the Dems plan to ignore the will of the voters in the Scott-Nelson Senate race.
The Clinton connection involves a law firm at which Elias is a partner. He is a key figure behind a notorious anti-Trump dossier compiled for the 2016 Clinton campaign.
This character’s connection with that tawdry work of fiction, paid for by the Clinton campaign and used to launch the ridiculous yet dangerous Mueller investigation, doesn’t enhance his credibility.
Nor does it reflect well on the motives of @SenBillNelson or his adamant refusal to concede that he lost to Rick Scott. It also suggests that Trump was on to something when he tweeted, “Democrats sent their best election stealing lawyer, Marc Elias.”
It also explains Senator Lindsey Graham’s obvious outrage when he compared it to the Kavanaugh showdown:
"They didn’t destroy Kavanaugh, and they’re not going to screw Scott.… This lib activist lawyer, the Clinton lawyer, went to FL with the purpose of winning the election.… The 2018 cycle will be remembered for lib Dems doing whatever it takes for ...votes to win, law be damned."
The reason the Democrats tried to destroy Kavanaugh is that they need a left-leaning Supreme Court to facilitate the machinations of their oily advocates.
Having given up any pretense of simply obeying the law, the Democrats depend on their lawyers to make sure it doesn’t cause much inconvenience. Thus, the Democrat loser in the Florida gubernatorial race has also lawyered up and is mulling some sort of skullduggery.
.@AndrewGillum’s attorney, Barry Richard, says that he is seriously considering legal action:
"... we are receiving an increasing amount of evidence that FL's effort to make the (elections) statutes more efficient has been done at the sacrifice of the fundamental right to vote"
"... we are receiving an increasing amount of evidence that FL's effort to make the (elections) statutes more efficient has been done at the sacrifice of the fundamental right to vote"
This is, of course, the same line of balderdash that we are getting from across the state line in Georgia. Democrat loser @StaceyAbrams would have us believe that she is on a noble crusade to make sure every vote is counted.
Her obvious goal is to manufacture enough mystery ballots to push the vote total for the winner, Brian Kemp, below the 50% mark so she can force an election “do-over” in December.
Time is not on her side, nor is the math, so she and the Democratic Party of Georgia have filed a lawsuit against the new Secretary of State to delay certification of the election results.
This, if you will recall, is the same maneuver that Al Gore’s lawyers attempted in Florida 18 years ago. They sued Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris to prevent her from certifying the 2000 election results. The gambit didn’t work for Gore and it won’t work for Abrams.
And if you doubt that this is indeed the age of miracles, Abrams received an even higher percentage of the vote in heavily Democratic counties like Fulton and Clayton than erstwhile Obama received in the 2008 or 2012 presidential elections.
In Fulton County, for example, Obama received 64.1% of the vote in 2012. In new votes found Monday, Abrams received well over 80%. Another miracle took place Tuesday when Abrams' campaign discovered even more “uncounted” ballots - 73% were (surprise!) allegedly cast for Abrams
As @LindseyGrahamSC put it, “In the eyes of Democrats, the law is just something to get around when it comes to winning what you want.” That’s why they’re dangerous. Our government, like the Roman republic, is based on the principle that no one is above the law.
The Democrats have assiduously undermined that principle, but this is as dangerous for them as it is for us.
