Profile picture
GeoSciTweeps: Jamie @GeoSciTweeps
, 31 tweets, 9 min read Read on Twitter
Good morning from a UK with slightly less dull weather! I want to discuss two topics which are often confused & misunderstood, but first I wanted to clarify a few things from yesterday's threads #earthquake #Stress #faults 1/n
Referring back to the block diagram for dip-slip faults from yesterday, @CriticalStress_ noted that the stress arrows at the top were wrong. All faults have a confining (inward) compressional stress, but stresses from other directions can be larger 2/n
This diagram from @SEELeeds shows that in the example block diagram I gave the smallest stress (sigma-3, min) is inward perpendicular to the fault. The primary stress - the largest amount of force acting on the rock to produce a normal fault - is vertical: GRAVITY! 3/n
This diagram also helps explain another dimension I forgot to explain. Normal faults have an inclination (dip) of 45-60 degrees; reverse faults tend to be shallow & if the dip is below 45 degrees are called thrust faults; and strike-slip faults are vertical (90 degrees dip) 4/n
An update on global seismicity from overnight is very simple as not a great deal happened. Nonetheless there have been some earthquakes: a small Hindu Kush quake is a common occurrence, a less usual quake in Germany & aftershocks to recent quakes in the western Pacific 5/n
On this day (17 November) in the past 5 years (2013-2017) there have been four quakes larger than magnitude 6.0. The least interesting were a M6.1 southeast of Africa (Andrew Bain Fracture Zone) in 2014 & a M6.4 in Tibet, north of Assam province, in 2017 6/n
Of greater interest are the quakes in 2013 & 2015. In 2013 a massive magnitude 7.7 earthquake struck near the South Orkney Islands, between South America & Antarctica. This quake was the result of the rupture of a ~280 kilometre long strike-slip fault: earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/ev… 7/n
A damaging magnitude 6.5 quake occurred near the island of Lefkada in western Greece #OTD in 2015. This strike-slip quake killed 2 people, damaged 120 buildings & destroyed 42, as well as triggering landslides and rockfalls: earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/ev… 8/n
By mentioning these earthquakes I have introduced MAGNITUDE as a term used liberally by seismologists. You may have heard of quakes being given a magnitude when reported on the evening news bulletin, the radio or in your newspaper. But what does magnitude mean? 9/n
Magnitude is a term used to quantify the size of an earthquake. Put simply the smaller a magnitude the smaller the earthquake was & the less impact a quake will in theory have (there are a many caveats to this - I will explain those later on when I introduce the second term) 10/n
The magnitude is calculated using the recordings of an earthquake made on an instrument called a seismograph (or seismometer). This instrument records the shaking of a quake, using a pendulum or spring which moves as seismic waves arrive to record the motion of the ground 11/n
The first magnitude system was developed in the 1930s by a man called Charles Richter. Today journalists often refer to the magnitude of an earthquake as a Richter magnitude - though this is often incorrect, all of the magnitude systems developed are based on his original 12/n
Richter decided that the smallest earthquakes the seismographs of the day could detect would be a magnitude 0. The magnitude was linked to the maximum amplitude of the seismic signal recorded, and each time the amplitude became 10 times larger, the magnitude increased by 1 13/n
Therefore the magnitude system is a logarithmic scale - every increase of 1 magnitude equals an increase in the signal's amplitude by 10. If a signal is 1000 times larger than that from a magnitude 2.0 earthquake, it is magnitude 5.0; if 10 times larger it is M3.0 & so on... 14/n
Richter realised that his magnitude system had no real correlation to the physical size of the earthquake - it only related to the "size" of the seismic signals detected, not the amount of energy released or dimensions of the fault responsible for the earthquake 15/n
There were other problems with Richter's local magnitude (ML=local magnitude). The instruments used for his system could not easily record quakes which occurred large distances away - only the long-period, surface waves (Rayleigh & Love waves) would be recorded by them 16/n
At closer distances the maximum amplitude would be found in the recordable body-waves (P- & S-waves), so the lack of these waves at large distances meant that the magnitudes calculated there would be highly inaccurate. A method to compensate for this needed to be devised 17/n
Two of these were indeed devised. The first used the largest amplitude in a period of surface-waves - this was called the surface-wave magnitude (Ms) & is rarely used today. The second used the largest amplitude in a period of body-waves - the body-wave magnitude (Mb) 18/n
These magnitude systems were more stable as they allowed for accurate magnitude calculation over large distances on the Earth's surface - a station in the UK could now have a better magnitude estimate for a quake in California. However, for large quakes this did not work 19/n
Three major quakes in the 20th century were the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake, the 1960 Valdivia (Chile) Earthquake & the 1964 Great Alaskan Earthquake. These all had different sized energy releases, but the surface-wave magnitude made them all equal as Ms 8.3 20/n
This problem of differentiating the size of large quakes is known as magnitude saturation - the size of a quake cannot be differentiated by the amplitude of a particular seismic wave. This occurs at about Mb = 6.0 and at Ms = 7.3 respectively 21/n
The result was the devising of a more accurate magnitude system which better represented the physical size and energy release involved during an earthquake. This magnitude system - what is commonly referred to in the news wrongly as Richter magnitude - is moment magnitude 22/n
Moment magnitude is based on the principle of a moment. A moment measures how much energy is needed to push an object which pivots on a point - the amount of force (N) exerted multiplied by the distance (m) from the point you push to the pivot point. This is measured in Nm 23/n
N = newtons; m = metres, so the unit of moment is Newton-metres. Imagine two people rotating a table. If they push towards each other from opposite sides the table will not move; if they push away from one another from opposite sides the table will rotate 24/n
The principle for a quake is similar as opposing forces produce an earthquake ((). In this case, rather than force & distance, the three components of seismic moment are the ability of the rock to move, the average slip on the fault & the fault's area 25/n
This idea was first used for an earthquake in 1966, but a magnitude system (moment magnitude - Mw) utilising this theory was first devised by Hiroo Kanamori & Thomas Hanks (NOT the actor!) in 1979. Ever since this magnitude has become the preferred magnitude system 26/n
This system works very well for the three 20th century earthquakes; rather than all being M8.3, the 1906 San Francisco quake had a moment magnitude (Mw) of 7.7; 1960 Valdivia was Mw 9.5 - the largest quake ever recorded - and 1964 Alaska was Mw 9.2 27/n
These different magnitude systems are often calculated when an earthquake occurs. For moderate or large (>M4.5) quakes body-wave magnitude (Mb) is often first calculated as body-waves are the first to arrive & thus easy to measure for an initial magnitude estimate 28/n
As more seismograph stations detect the earthquake the accuracy of the body-wave magnitude increases. In the same time the waves required to calculate a moment magnitude have also arrived, and as more data comes in the moment magnitude is calculated to greater accuracy 29/n
This is why an initially recorded magnitude is reported by the news, but in reality is out-of-date & therefore wrong as this was a very early estimate of the magnitude. A great explanation of this process by @IRIS_EPO can be found here: 30/n
I hope this explains what a magnitude is & also explains why it is confusing for people - there is not just one type of magnitude but several, one of which (surface-wave) is rarely used & another (original Richter local magnitude) is no longer used at all 31/31
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to GeoSciTweeps: Jamie
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!