John Sipher, as he states, "The Steele info was just a starting point for professional investigators."
I thought Steele was a professional investigator? Or Fusion GPS? Isn't that what they're meant to do: investigate?
But instead they handed out their information to everybody.
I thought Steele was a professional investigator? Or Fusion GPS? Isn't that what they're meant to do: investigate?
But instead they handed out their information to everybody.
Let's face the facts. They handed out the dossier to multiple intelligence agencies around the world, they handed it out to various news agencies around America, they handed it out to random people at random times. They didn't actually care who took it.
How many professional investigators does it take to get to the bottom of the dossier?
Hell, the first memo was written on June 20, 2016. So it's been over two years now and these "professional investigators" still have fuck all, but sure, the narrative is the most important.
Hell, the first memo was written on June 20, 2016. So it's been over two years now and these "professional investigators" still have fuck all, but sure, the narrative is the most important.
The FBI used it for a FISA, probably couriered through that company, Aveshka. Seems as if a lot of things were done in relation to this through third party sources. Anybody citing the dossier, Steele, or anything related to it should be treated like the pieces of shit they are.
It's been TWO YEARS and they have NOTHING. All they have is feelings, emotions, "wah wah Trump is a big meanie" bullshit, even though what they have done is lie to the entire planet and call it a news story.
Remember Comey's letter from a source about Loretta Lynch? How many times has the FBI relied on faulty information to accomplish some other purpose? You really think this stops at the July 5 press briefing and the FISA warrant? That's a laugh in itself.
Shame that nobody will actually have a look, because all of these institutions are incestuously built. Journalists will sign NDAs one second and lie to you the next, all for that precious "access" - which they will then do absolutely nothing with, except laugh at you from afar.
If all of these "professional investigators" completely fucking failed to prove collusion, then that's the end, right?
Oh, wait, no, of course not, because blumpf did a blumpf. Never mind, time to burn the Constitution to the ground and siege the White House.
Oh, wait, no, of course not, because blumpf did a blumpf. Never mind, time to burn the Constitution to the ground and siege the White House.
Remember: Collusion has not yet been proven until somebody finally gets to the bottom of it.
Much like how Bigfoot hasn't been proven until somebody finally provides me with a clean photograph and video of it.
It's out there, we swear!
Much like how Bigfoot hasn't been proven until somebody finally provides me with a clean photograph and video of it.
It's out there, we swear!
The only type of journalism that will actually crack the story at this point is James O'Keefe style journalism, but tailored to combat people - actual spies - to get them to admit to shit they wouldn't say on their Twitter feed.
But is it even possible to outspy the spy?
But is it even possible to outspy the spy?
Think of it like a reverse interrogation. People like Sipher and McCabe would see somebody like O'Keefe coming a mile away, but spies are also pretty suspectible to "honey traps" (for lack of a better term), as you've seen repeatedly from O'Keefe's usage of substitutes.
