,
3 tweets,
1 min read
Read on Twitter
What I understand Roger Stone to be saying on CNN right now is a *lot* of witnesses may say he's guilty as hell but if they do (a) Mueller threatened them into lying and (b) there'll be no corroboration of all that testimonial evidence because he always spoke to Trump on a burner
2/ Stone is one of these purveyors (as is Trump) of the fantasy that testimonial evidence *requires*, by law, corroboration by physical evidence or a defendant's confession
In fact, Mueller will be *just fine* if he has text messages, emails, and multiple witnesses
*Just fine*
In fact, Mueller will be *just fine* if he has text messages, emails, and multiple witnesses
*Just fine*
3/ Obviously the burner thing's a joke, but it's evident Stone thinks it's impossible there will be physical evidence corroborating testimony on his and Trump's collusion with WikiLeaks, which says to me he's confident that his means of regular communication with Trump was covert
