A majority in this parliament needs to get to 320. It's been repeated so often that it has become a truth—that there is a majority for a soft Brexit in parliament.
Here's why that's almost certainly not the case.
(1/9)
Soft Brexit is the position of the leadership (see JC letter to TM 6/2).
But there are at least 60 strong backers of a people's vote in the PLP & maybe 5 who want a harder Brexit.
So Labour brings max 180 MPs to soft Brexit.
(2/9)
Well, Scotland voted to Remain, and yesterday Sturgeon said: "preferably asking for a longer extension to put the issue back to voters".
So don't count on any SNP support for soft Brexit
(3/9)
So no support there either.
(4/9)
What are the chances of that? Slim to none. Here's why.
(5/9)
How would Tory MPs explain abandoning "global Britain" and "a great global trading nation" for a customs union & no independent trade policy?
(6/9)
Backing a soft Brexit could mean sliding down the greasy pole rather than climbing up it.
(7/9)
Nick Boles has been brave. But there's a reason that 'brave' in politics tends to mean courageous & foolish at the same time.
Are there 140 brave Tory MPs? No way.
(8/9)
MPs need to prepare themselves to support a long extension and a fundamental rethink if they want to avoid no-deal.
In the *end*, that will mean a 2nd referendum.
(9/9)