- This is about male/female divide in competitions
- 46 XY DSD athletes are ‘biological males’
=> They enjoy similar testosterone-derived advantages as males
=> Eligibility to female events cannot be based on ‘legal sex’
Is there a true risk of a massive influx of competitive 46 XY DSD female athletes in athletics competitions? I have no definitive answer, but I’ve the intuition that the idea of a wave of 46 XY DSDs crowding out female athletes could be misleading.
I’m not sure I share the view of the panel that the objective is proportionate to the medical interventions suggested in the rules or the risks of personal hardship à la Semenya faced by the athletes affected.
This is hypocritical at best: you are deciding whether @caster800m is allowed to enter ‘female’ events, you are judging her sex.