,
9 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
Well. NFS. Sater uncooperative. Gasp. Pfft. google.com/amp/s/www.poli…
If only there had been signs 🙄 But in a rare statement after the interview, a committee spokesman accused Sater of being uncooperative and obstructing the panel’s investigation by withholding documents and testimony in defiance of a subpoena.
No way. The docs ya needed for breaking through the wall of lies?!? Among the evidence the panel asked for but didn’t receive, according to Boland, were unredacted phone records and documents related to a joint defense agreement with Trump’s longtime personal lawyer Michael Cohen
🤣🤣 they ❤️ that privilege ➡️ Wolf said he told the panel that those communications were privileged but would not comment on whether a joint defense agreement was in place.
So Sater was Cohen client?!?
It’s privileged 🙃 In his statement, Boland said the panel’s probe had uncovered no proof that Sater was part of a joint defense agreement, and therefore "has no basis to assert this privilege over these documents.”
Damn my dictionary. Totally different for “fully and completely” and apparently from 👆”every” is subjective 
See. This is why 🗣PUBLIC HEARINGS would be beneficial
