Thread by @TheForeverAlpha

5 Reasons Intermittent Fasting Is Not 'Starving' Yourself (Thread):

One of the most common (and weak) objections to IF, is that it's 'starving yourself'.

I see the logic - you're 'not eating' breakfast.

So you must be starving, right?

Wrong.

Here's why:

1) It's Literally Impossible To Starve If You Currently Have Any Body Fat

Right off the bat, people who come out with this objection almost always have 20%+ bf.

And guess what?

You couldn't starve at that level of fat, even if you wanted to.

Next:

#2) It's Impossible To Starve At 2000+ Calories

And the vast majority of people on my IF eating system, are eating more than 2000 calories and losing fat.

But they won't STARVE at this level, and neither will you.

You'll stall well before you get anywhere near 'starving'.

#3) You're Re-allocating, Rather Than Eliminating

You may be a little more hungry in the AM at first.

But remember that you're not 'starving', because you're simply shifting most of these calories backwards.

And they're usually BETTER calories too (no cereal, toast).

Next:

#4) You're Feasting In The Evening

You get to feast on tons of good food:

- Meat
- Fish
- Veggies
- Eggs
- etc.

Which makes it difficult to claim that you're 'starving'.

You're not.

You make up for it later.

Next:

#5) You Feel FULLER, On Less Calories

If anything, you're the opposite of 'starving.'

And this is the 'magic' of IF.

You get fuller (not hungrier, like most diets), on less calories.

Finally:

Get:

- Leaner
- Sharper
- Healthier
- Younger-looking
- Better-looking

WITHOUT starving, or rebounding, by getting daily strategies below,

Grab your FOUR free ebooks too:

foreveralphablog.co.uk

If you're ready to get to 10% body fat in a long-term, sustainable manner (and not starving), then get a personalised IF meal plan below:

foreveralphablog.co.uk/intermittent-f…