,
4 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
I'd like to propose a change of Brexit names. Some argue Brexit should not be split up so as better to oppose it.
I understand, but IMHO that benefit does not outway failing to oppose the merging of Brexits into 1. No DEAL isn't brexit, and we should not have participated.
I understand, but IMHO that benefit does not outway failing to oppose the merging of Brexits into 1. No DEAL isn't brexit, and we should not have participated.
With humility - I obviously cannot drive this, who the heck am I? But I can ask remain as a community to consider this, and to retweet if you agree.
I suggest some alternative names below, as uncontroversial in definition (time sequence) and definition (what was in public)
I suggest some alternative names below, as uncontroversial in definition (time sequence) and definition (what was in public)
I don't want to add a long selling process into this thread, I ask you to consider just 2 points
1. What's the relative risk benefit of separating brexit, even if it's only the remain community?
2. Even at this late state, is there advantage or disadvantage in making the attempt?
1. What's the relative risk benefit of separating brexit, even if it's only the remain community?
2. Even at this late state, is there advantage or disadvantage in making the attempt?
A simple summary
And the question you should ALWAYS ASK
Which brexit?
And the question you should ALWAYS ASK
Which brexit?
