, 13 tweets, 6 min read
We have long had a debate over who was interviewing Peter Strzok in the summer of 2017. Some thought it was Mueller's agents some thought it was Horowitz's OIG team.
It may have been several entities.
He was interviewed on 7/26/17 by FBI's Inspection Division, Internal Affairs.
This interview & statement was about leaks investigations.
The same thing McCabe & Page were being interviewed by INSD. An investigation started by Comey to identify who violated FBI policy to leak about the Clinton Foundation investigation. It was Page on orders from McCabe!
It starts with questions about an email dated 2/21/17 between Sara Carter & FBI press contact Michael Kortan.

But the next couple of paragraphs are redacted.
Must be an active criminal investigation.
When the redaction ends, we find out the Sara Carter email was about the famous "F^(# Flynn" comments.
Though Sara's email has it worded slightly differently than the articles published by True Pundit.
What makes it most interesting, is that Sara had this 2/21/17. The investigation into the leak of the comments started 3/9/17, True Pundit published on 3/14/17 & INSD opened a leak investigation on 3/15/17.
Sara Carter's email is also included in the attachments to the latest filing in the Flynn case seeking Brady information. It is available here: sidneypowell.com/wp-content/upl…
It begs the question, if this outburst against Flynn & Trump never happened, why would FBI internal affairs be investigating it as a leak?
Also recall that this interview of Strzok is 1 day before he is removed from the Special Counsel team when OIG produced the text messages.
Did those text messages show he lied to INSD?
Is that what triggered his removal at that specific time?

In this statement Strzok denies the substance of the allegations against McCabe. Opining that someone must have heard something second hand & embellished it before leaking it!
More interesting and previously unreported to my knowledge, Sara Carter's 2/21/17 email (a week after Flynn resigned) states that 2 FBI agents threatened to testify on Flynn's behalf that he wasn't lying.

Strzok denies that allegation & incident!
Strzok says it doesn't make sense, there was no case open about Flynn, who would they testify to?

But soon there would be...
He also denies that they did high fives & celebrated that they got Flynn... Redact, redacted, redacted...

Which means an open criminal investigation about that meeting....

I think they swallowed the bait!
So after about 3 pages of redacted information. Strzok signs his life away on this statement. Written on 08/14/17, so the August 302 was from the 7/26/17 interview by INSD on the leak about how McCabe was planning to F @GenFlynn
Wonder what Judge Sullivan will think of all the redacted stuff that we can't read but he can!
#ButNothingsHappening
@threadreaderapp unroll please.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with DawsonSField

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!