i'm hooting and hollering over here imagining the good shepherd explaining to the judge that she does not, in fact, currently have easy access to enough oxen to drag down a confederate monument and this was simply a very good joke online.
this is actually better and funnier than the time a nazi's lawyer included in a legal filing that i am a BOLSHEVIK TERRORIST because i tweeted a picture of his office that i found online.
there was once a time when i had the mistaken belief that all lawyers were smart and knowledgeable.
it turns out most of 'em are easily confused by shitposting.
it turns out most of 'em are easily confused by shitposting.
ok knowledgable source has directed me to the full affidavit & supporting memo & apparently this was submitted by folks in favor of removing the monument to show it’s in danger of destruction if left up. still, it relies on the assumption that a judge won’t understand shitposting
(judges absolutely do not understand shitposting. i once watched a witness try to explain to a judge what facebook live is. and another time i watched a nazi explain to a judge what gab is. judges are not online.)
