In modern times, Muslims were not the main opposition to the Ram Temple. Many were willing to accomodate.
The biggest culprits were communists and "seculars" who deliberately instigated with lies and deceit to deny facts due to Hindu-hate. Shameful.
firstpost.com/india/left-his…
The biggest culprits were communists and "seculars" who deliberately instigated with lies and deceit to deny facts due to Hindu-hate. Shameful.
firstpost.com/india/left-his…
For India's Left, ideology and propaganda always trumps truth. The "eminent" Marxist historians lie for a living using ideology to distort every reading of history and even plain archeological facts.
If there is an "divider in chief" in India, it is Indian seculars and communists. They lied to deny a temple existed despite overwhelming evidence and instigated Muslims to riot. Mulayam's police opened fire, killing hundreds. Seculars ride on corpses.
For Islamists like #Owaisi, the agenda was different. Babri structure was insignificant to them from a religious perspective. Its main significance was dominance over land which was sacred to Hindus for Islamic supremacy. Left were useful idiots for them.
The main and only issue on Babri for Islamists (and their Left fan boys) is that it is a reversal of Islamic triumphalism and erases the myth of supremacy.
The same monotheistic supremacy shows up in destruction of native sacred temples across the globe. They prove "their God" is superior by destroying other's sacred places, building on them. See my guide in Peru.
