My immediate reaction upon leaving the theater: This film is custom-made for a crossover between @SocHistTech and History at the Movies (#HATM).
(@HerbertHistory-If this comes to pass, let me know!)
#histSTM (1/17)
Yes, Tesla is there too (more on him in a moment), but the system-builders (cf. Hughes) are front and center.
(2/17)
Remember-Mary died in 1884. Tom & Mina wed just two years later, squarely within the movie's timeframe!
(4/17)
Tuppence Middleton has some poignant scenes as Mary Edison, but Katherine Waterston's Marguerite Westinghouse has few chances to shine.
(5/17)
Let me put it this way: The movie introduces several key figures w/splash text. (e.g. "Thomas Edison-Inventor")
Tesla is presented, not as a scientist or inventor, but a "futurist."
(6/17)
(Thankfully, no one claimed Tesla was "overlooked by history.")
(7/17)
(8/17)
(9/17)
More on Latimer's life via @IEEEHistory ethw.org/Lewis_Latimer
(10/17)
@edisonpapers has details re: Latimer's technical career: edison.rutgers.edu/latimer/invtli…
(11/17)
Latimer also wrote an early book on incandescent lighting, which sadly @LindaHall_org doesn't seem to have in its collections...yet.
(12/17)
Yet during one scene in Menlo Park, Edison chats w/a familiar looking African-American employee. He isn't named onscreen, but the credits & IMDB imply it's Latimer.
(13/17)
(14/17)
(Note: So far as I'm aware, Latimer wasn't involved in debates over the safety of AC, which made his role here seem really problematic!)
(15/17)
It is, however, a deeply problematic film, providing at best a superficial & at worse inaccurate view of the AC-DC debates.
(17/17)