In 2008 one of my colleagues arrived back at her house to find her maid missing.
After a bit of searching she found the maid sitting in the park, with the dog, enjoying the afternoon.
Puzzled, my colleague asked why she thought the world might end.
"They said so on TV," the maid replied.
There had been some speculation that the collission of particles in the LHC could create tiny black holes.
None of them specified that anything due to the LHC would be infinitesimal and last for no time at all.
"But if it wasn't true it wouldn't be on TV, would it?" the maid asked. She was genuinely asking.
She had assessed the news that she was given, and had taken the most sensible decision.
Better to spend time in the park.
In his great book on the Balkans War, "Love Thy Neighbour", @maassp writes about how Milosevic's total control of news reduced the population to hysteria and fear.
To expect rational decisionmaking in this atmosphere requires significant effort and research.
It is an unreasonable demand.
They cannot be asked to invest so much effort, and they should not be judged on their inability to do so.
The only silver lining I see is that regimes dependent on such lies often fall, like in Eastern Europe.
"The truth will out".
I hope this does not happen to us.
-end-