, 3 tweets, 1 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
What this hearing boils down to: Col. Vindman claimed to be alarmed at the 7/25 call because he felt the conversation was a "demand." It was not.

Read the call transcript. Note the phrases like "if that's possible," "if you can look into it," "whatever you can do."
IN FACT: when Col. Vindman was pressed on his characterization of the call as a "demand" in his deposition (p. 256), this is what he said:

"I think people want to hear, you know, what they have as already preconceived notions... I guess you can interpret it in different ways."
Here's the text of the deposition question and answer. Read it.

Bottom line: the pretext for this hearing is baseless. @realDonaldTrump didn't demand a thing.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Mark Meadows

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!